23 years of TransGraph: what we are building TransRisk to be
TransGraph turns 23 this month, and TransRisk has been part of that journey since 2008. An anniversary is a reasonable moment to say plainly what we are building, and why.
Start with the problem our clients actually have. Exposure sits in the ERP. Hedges sit with treasury or a broker. Contracted volumes sit with procurement. Inventory costs and yields sit with operations. Each team holds a piece, each piece is current, and no one holds the whole. So the question that gates every commercial decision — given where we already stand, can we act on this view, and by how much? — takes two days and three spreadsheets to answer, by which time the market has moved.
TransRisk exists to answer that question in one place, every morning: exposure, hedges, margin and mark-to-market from a single dataset, visible to procurement, treasury, finance, risk and leadership at the same time.
Three things have to work together for that answer to be worth anything. Human judgement, because markets reward relevance, not information. Machines, because no team can consolidate positions across systems fast enough by hand. And governance, because a number nobody can audit is a number nobody will act on. Take away any one and the other two stop mattering.
This is why the spread of AI has not distracted our direction. Information is getting cheaper and faster for everyone, ours and our competitors' alike. What is not getting cheaper is the judgement to read a market correctly and the discipline to stand behind a number. AI makes analysts faster. It does not make a recommendation defensible.
Which brings us to the thing we care most about. Every number TransRisk produces can be opened up — traced back to the data, the position and the method that produced it. Nothing is asserted that cannot be shown. We build it that way because transparency is what earns trust, and trust is what a client is really relying on when they take a position on our work.
That has been true for 23 years. It is what we are still building for.
Read the discussion on LinkedIn →